<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starbucks: Big Investors&#8217; Divorce Grounds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coffeestrategies.com/2008/08/18/starbucks-big-investors-divorce-grounds/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coffeestrategies.com/2008/08/18/starbucks-big-investors-divorce-grounds</link>
	<description>andrew hetzel on better coffee, better business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:32:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Edward Cobb</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeestrategies.com/2008/08/18/starbucks-big-investors-divorce-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-8659</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward Cobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 05:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeestrategies.com/?p=265#comment-8659</guid>
		<description>Starbucks recently closed 61 of its 84 Australian stores. In my view, they&#039;ve failed to understand the Australian coffee beverage consumer; made the wrong product offerings and had an insufficient range of coffee accompaniments to purchase. If you believe Starbucks the company got hurt because it also had stores in low foot traffic locations. Sure some of their stores may have been in low foot traffic locations, but 61 out of 84? I think the low foot traffic excuse is just a smoke screen. About the only thing Starbucks are particularly good at is choosing the right location for a store. I can&#039;t accept that it got location choice wrong in Australia 72% of the time! Marketing is about identifying customers needs and satisfying them. Starbucks took its eye off the ball and failed to do that. In Australia, the company unsuccessfully tried to apply a formula that seemed to be a success  elsewhere and made no attempt to adjust to local market requirements. I&#039;ll be generous and give Starbucks another 5 years before it&#039;s exited the Australian market completely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starbucks recently closed 61 of its 84 Australian stores. In my view, they&#8217;ve failed to understand the Australian coffee beverage consumer; made the wrong product offerings and had an insufficient range of coffee accompaniments to purchase. If you believe Starbucks the company got hurt because it also had stores in low foot traffic locations. Sure some of their stores may have been in low foot traffic locations, but 61 out of 84? I think the low foot traffic excuse is just a smoke screen. About the only thing Starbucks are particularly good at is choosing the right location for a store. I can&#8217;t accept that it got location choice wrong in Australia 72% of the time! Marketing is about identifying customers needs and satisfying them. Starbucks took its eye off the ball and failed to do that. In Australia, the company unsuccessfully tried to apply a formula that seemed to be a success  elsewhere and made no attempt to adjust to local market requirements. I&#8217;ll be generous and give Starbucks another 5 years before it&#8217;s exited the Australian market completely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Donde</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeestrategies.com/2008/08/18/starbucks-big-investors-divorce-grounds/comment-page-1#comment-8650</link>
		<dc:creator>David Donde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 08:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeestrategies.com/?p=265#comment-8650</guid>
		<description>Playing to the wrong fiddler will always cause one to hit a wall.

Interesting observations, thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Playing to the wrong fiddler will always cause one to hit a wall.</p>
<p>Interesting observations, thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
